Write the Employee engagement in Literature Review
Write the Employee engagement in Literature Review.Employee Engagement: What is it? What causes it? What does it lead to?Organisational Behaviour (MNG82210) Assignment 1 Guidelines and Marking Criteria Title: Literature Review Marks: 35 (which is 35% of the unit grade) Due: Prior to 9am Monday 16th July, 2018 (Week 3). Task: Undertake a Literature Review (1500 words +/- 10%) on – Employee Engagement: What is it? What causes it? What does it lead to? The review is to rely solely on information that comes from peer-reviewed academic journal articles. A minimum of six individual sources are required. Note: students should make themselves fully aware of the penalties that may be applied for cases of Academic Misconduct, such as submitting work that is not their own. Access this document for further information. Purpose: As students of Organisational Behaviour it is important that you are able to effectively identify, collate and disseminate credible information on a range of issues that have strong theoretical and/or practical relevance to the field. Such information will often provide the basis for effective planning and decision-making. Format: The single document submitted for this assignment is to contain the following components and formatting features: Components a) Assignment ‘Coverpage’ – identifying the unit name & code, assignment title, student name & ID, and the word count of the review. This is a document that students develop themselves; i.e. there is no Coverpage template. It should not be numbered. b) Content; i.e. your Literature Review (1500 words +/- 10%). Reviews that exceed 1650 words will be returned for editing and resubmission. Key features of this component are – i. A ‘catchy’ Title; one that signals the central theme or focus of the review. Thereafter you can include any subheadings that might help to effectively structure the discussion. No Table of Contents or abstract is required. ii. Appropriate referencing skills must be demonstrated. Follow the Library’s Harvard Referencing style guide -http://libguides.scu.edu.au/ld.php?content_id=31222394. Note: Quoting is only permitted when providing the definition of a concept. Paraphrase all other information obtained from your various sources. c) Reference List. This content is not included in the word count. Formatting Features o Apply page numbers. Page 1 comes after the coverpage and is placed bottom right hand corner. o Font style: Times New Roman, 12pt, justified, 1½ line spacing. o Margins – top and bottom to be 2.54cm. Left and right to be 2.54cm. No page boarders. o Spelling – if using a Microsoft package, specify Australian English language/grammar when running your spell-check. o Writing and grammar must conform to the standards of a professional report. Submitting: Ensure that the assignment document has been saved in your name (e.g. Pat Gillett.docx). All assignments are to be submitted through ‘Turn-it-in,’ which can be accessed from the ‘Assignment 1’ folder on Blackboard. The link will be activated in week 1 and you can submit the assignment multiple times up until the due date. Feedback: Students who submit their report by the due date will receive feedback within 1 week. This feedback will be in the form of a marking rubric and a copy of your report with electronic comments from the marker. Marking Criteria: A. Content (weight = 28.6% of marks) 1) Unsatisfactory. Much of the information on EE is inaccurate or the level of detail is insufficient to demonstrate a basic understanding. 2) Pass. The review reflects a basic understanding of EE. There are some minor inaccuracies or ambiguous features of EE that need to be reviewed and revised. 3) Credit. The review reflects a good understanding of EE. Extending the scope of the review will help to demonstrate a deeper level of knowledge. 4) Distinction. The review effectively describes EE and its relevance to OB. Work on maintaining the particular focus of your review (i.e. what you want to say about EE) by keeping the discussion on-point and/or removing irrelevant content. 5) HD. The review reflects an extremely strong understanding of EE and its relevance to OB. Your strong analysis gives the review a distinct and purposeful quality. Well done. C. Use of academic Sources (weight = 25.7% of marks) 1) Unsatisfactory. Information from published sources is not cited or information that is cited makes no meaningful contribution to the discussion. 2) Pass. The information in your review is appropriately cited however too much of it is simply repeated as individual statements. 3) Credit. A good attempt has been made to synthesise information from different sources. Work on your paraphrasing skills to present the information in a way that more clearly identifies and supports the distinct focus of the review. 4) Distinction. Information from a range of academic sources are effectively weaved into the discussion, thereby helping to give your review a distinct focus. 5) HD. In addition to the Distinction qualities, a strong effort has also been made to cite empirical research findings that support and complement the discussion. B. Writing Quality (weight = 25.7% of marks) 1) Unsatisfactory. The writing is ineffective. This can be due to numerous spelling errors, grammatical errors, or poor sentence/paragraph structure. 2) Pass. Proof-read the final document to identify and correct minor writing errors. Plan for and undertake additional drafts as this will help to improve the quality of your written work. 3) Credit. A good standard of writing is provided (no spelling errors) however there is room for improvement in terms of higher-order writing skills (e.g. vocabulary and sentence structure). 4) Distinction. Higher-order writing skills are evident in parts. Greater consistency will improve the overall quality of your work. 5) HD. The quality of writing in the report is exceptional. Well done. D. Referencing and Formatting (weight = 20% of marks) 1) Unsatisfactory. The assignment document is unprofessionally presented and/or the required number of references are not provided. 2) Pass. The assignment document meets a satisfactory standard of presentation but several (at least 2) formatting features have not been adopted and there are several (at least 2) errors with the referencing style. 3) Credit. At least one formatting feature has not been adopted and there is at least one referencing style error. 4) Distinction. One formatting feature has not been adopted or there is one referencing style error. 5)
Answer preview:
Words:1334