A literature review on the barriers that disabled entrepreneurs face

Literature Review CA381
Topic of the literature
Disabled entrepreneurs often face a range of barriers when starting a business. What is the evidence for this in the literature and what recommendations would you make to a disabled entrepreneur who is considering starting a business.

The Literature Review Marking Scheme: The following format should be followed: The title page-abstract-references-appendices .A contents page is not required.

• Title page
• Abstract (ideally around 500 words to offer an effective overall summary)
• Introduction
 Introduction to include an academic definition and some factual data about the context of the set question
• Main contents
 Various sub-headings
 Includes good use of references with occasional quotes
 Good mix and range of sources
 Critical commentary
• Advantages/disadvantages
• Evidence for and against
• Conclusions: Offers a clear rationale that answers the set questions
• Recommendations: A reasoned set of recommendations that matches the
concern of the set question
• References (Harvard)
o A minimum of 20 references (No Wikipedia), a mix of texts, journals (emerald) and reports from a range of sources e.g. Business Source Premier (BSP), Mintel, Expanded Academic ASAP, trade associations, govt reports, newspaper analysis, business groups (IOD and FSB) and other policy sources).

Literature Review CA381 

Handin Dates:  For semester 1 students 18.1.18 by 2359

Topic of the literature

Disabled entrepreneurs often face a range of barriers when starting a business. What is the evidence for this in the literature and what recommendations would you make to a disabled entrepreneur who is considering starting a business.

The Literature Review Marking Scheme: The following format should be followed: The title page-abstract-references-appendices are NOT part of the word count . A contents page is not required.

 

• Title page
• Abstract (ideally around 500 words to offer an effective overall summary)
• Introduction
  • • Introduction to include an academic definition and some factual data about the context of the set question
• Main contents
  • • Various sub-headings
    • Includes good use of references with occasional quotes
    • Good mix and range of sources
    • Critical commentary
      • Advantages/disadvantages
      • Evidence for and against
• Conclusions: Offers a clear rationale that answers the set questions
• Recommendations: A reasoned set of recommendations that matches the

concern of the set question

• References (Harvard)
  • A minimum of  20 references (No Wikipedia), a mix[1] of texts, journals (emerald) and reports from a range of sources e.g. Business Source Premier (BSP), Mintel, Expanded Academic ASAP,  trade associations, govt reports, newspaper analysis, business groups (IOD and FSB) and other policy sources).

[1] If you don’t use a mix of sources you will lose marks